Files
Unlucky-Launcher/crates/app-iced/src/app/view/logs/tests.rs
T
AskaEth 8a8e5ca0c0
CI / runtime smoke (macos arm64, probe) (push) Skipped
CI / fmt (rustfmt --check) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / clippy (ubuntu-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / clippy (windows-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / test (ubuntu-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / test (windows-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / build release (ubuntu-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / build release (windows-latest) (push) Canceled after 0s
CI / runtime smoke (ubuntu x64, xvfb) (push) Canceled after 0s
Guards / core 零 UI 守门 (push) Canceled after 0s
Guards / presenter 零 UI 守门 (push) Canceled after 0s
Guards / design 零第三方依赖守门 (push) Canceled after 0s
Guards / unsafe 落点守门(集合必须恰好一个文件) (push) Canceled after 0s
Guards / 文件行数 ≤400 守门 (push) Canceled after 0s
Guards / 依赖许可与来源(cargo-deny) (push) Canceled after 0s
Unlucky Launcher v0.2.0
首个 iced + Material 3 Expressive 版本的源码快照。
完整历史与日常提交在 dev 分支;main 只放阶段性快照。
2026-11-05 14:22:11 +08:00

243 lines
9.6 KiB
Rust
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
//! 日志页展示转换的守门测试(从 `app/view/logs.rs` 拆出:那边已经 382 行,贴着 400 硬上限)。
//!
//! 全部走**真实 reducer 路径**(`AppState::apply_core`),不造注入源——r3 的教训是
//! 「测试全走注入源而真实路径零覆盖」,所以这里的夹具就是线上那串事件本身。
use unlucky_i18n::Lang;
use unlucky_presenter::dto::{
CoreEvent, DiagnosisReport, LaunchFinished, LiveLogBatch, LogLevel, LogLine, LogOutcome,
LogSession,
};
use unlucky_presenter::state::AppState;
use crate::pages;
use super::logs_model;
/// 崩溃的那一场。
const CRASH: &str = "s-1029-1840";
/// 崩溃之后又启动的、正常跑的一场。
const OK_RUN: &str = "s-1029-1922";
fn session(id: &str, when: &str, outcome: LogOutcome) -> LogSession {
LogSession {
id: id.to_string(),
instance: "开发测试".to_string(),
when: when.to_string(),
outcome,
duration_secs: 62,
}
}
fn line(text: &str, level: LogLevel) -> LogLine {
LogLine {
text: text.to_string(),
level,
}
}
fn report(session: &str, rule: &str) -> DiagnosisReport {
DiagnosisReport {
session: session.to_string(),
diagnosis: pages_dto(rule),
}
}
fn pages_dto(rule: &str) -> unlucky_presenter::dto::Diagnosis {
unlucky_presenter::dto::Diagnosis {
rule: rule.to_string(),
title: "显卡驱动过旧(OpenGL 版本不足)".to_string(),
confidence: 92,
hint: "升级显卡驱动".to_string(),
fix: Some("change_graphics.driver".to_string()),
}
}
/// **真实数据路径**(复审要求:不许造注入源绕过去):
/// 崩溃一场跑完 → 再启动一场正常跑。`state.diagnosis` 在这里**故意不清**,
/// 因为 presenter 里根本没有清零点——这就是线上发生串场的条件。
fn crashed_only() -> AppState {
let mut state = AppState::new();
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogSessionsChanged(vec![
session(CRASH, "10-29 18:40", LogOutcome::Crashed),
session(OK_RUN, "10-29 19:22", LogOutcome::Ok),
]));
// 第一场跑起来(live_session = CRASH)→ 日志 → 规则结论 → 收尾(selected_session = CRASH)
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogAppended(LiveLogBatch {
session: CRASH.to_string(),
lines: vec![line("[18:40] boom: GLFW error", LogLevel::Error)],
running: true,
}));
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::DiagnosisReady(report(CRASH, "gpu.driver_old")));
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LaunchFinished(LaunchFinished {
id: "dev".to_string(),
session: CRASH.to_string(),
outcome: LogOutcome::Crashed,
summary: "崩溃(exit 1)".to_string(),
}));
state
}
/// 崩溃之后又启动一场正常跑:`live_session` 前进,`diagnosis` 仍是上一场的。
fn after_a_new_run() -> AppState {
let mut state = crashed_only();
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogAppended(LiveLogBatch {
session: OK_RUN.to_string(),
lines: vec![line("[19:22] launching 1.20.4", LogLevel::Info)],
running: true,
}));
state
}
#[test]
fn a_new_run_does_not_inherit_the_previous_crash() {
let state = after_a_new_run();
let logs = logs_model(&state).with_status(Lang::En);
// 抓得住:身份被上一场的 `diagnosis.session` 顶掉(r2 的 bug)——那时 outcome 会是
// Crashed、findings 挂着 gpu.driver_old、摘要里 `lines=` 与结论不同源。
// 抓不住:presenter 自己 `clear_logs` 后 `selected_session` 不清的缺口(已报 finding),
// 以及多场并行会话(本仓一次只跑一场)。
assert_eq!(
logs.outcome,
Some(pages::Outcome::Ok),
"身份应该是正在跑的这一场"
);
let status = logs.status.clone().expect("有会话身份就该有副标题");
assert!(status.contains("Finished normally"), "{status}");
assert!(
!status.contains("The game crashed"),
"页头把新会话标成了上一场的崩溃:{status}"
);
assert!(
logs.findings.is_empty(),
"上一场的结论不能挂到这一场:{:?}",
logs.findings
);
// 摘要必须与身份同源:outcome 是 ok、不含旧规则、行数就是当前这些行。
let summary = logs.summary();
assert!(summary.contains("outcome=ok"), "{summary}");
assert!(!summary.contains("gpu.driver_old"), "{summary}");
assert!(
summary.contains(&format!("lines={}", logs.lines.len())),
"{summary}"
);
assert!(!summary.contains("findings="), "{summary}");
}
#[test]
fn the_crash_itself_is_still_reported() {
// 上一条测试的**对照**:崩溃当场必须画结论,否则那条断言「findings 为空」是空的。
// 抓得住:把判别写成「永远不画诊断」(用空断言骗过 P2)。
// 抓不住:结论排序/去重(那是 core 的规则引擎的事)。
let state = crashed_only();
let logs = logs_model(&state).with_status(Lang::En);
assert_eq!(logs.outcome, Some(pages::Outcome::Crashed));
assert_eq!(logs.findings.len(), 1, "{:?}", logs.findings);
assert_eq!(logs.findings[0].rule, "gpu.driver_old");
let status = logs.status.clone().unwrap_or_default();
assert!(status.contains("The game crashed"), "{status}");
assert!(logs.summary().contains("gpu.driver_old:high(92)"));
}
#[test]
fn an_imported_crash_file_still_shows_its_findings() {
// r3 的**回归**:r3 把归属判据写成「有选中就只认选中」,于是导入崩溃日志
// (`ImportCrashLog` → `DiagnosisReady` 带 `file:<文件名>` 的会话 id,且**不发**
// `LogLinesChanged`)被整条丢掉。今天 iced 侧还没有 dispatch 站点(那些还在遗留的
// Slint shell 里),所以复审没判 p1;这条测试是为了**将来接线的人**不再踩。
// 抓得住:只有「属于当前选中/live 会话」才画的窄判据(导入的 `file:` 会话不等于任何
// 索引里的会话,会被误杀)。
// 抓不住:导入后日志正文该显示什么(`ImportCrashLog` 不载入日志行,那是 presenter 的事)。
let mut state = AppState::new();
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogSessionsChanged(vec![session(
CRASH,
"10-29 18:40",
LogOutcome::Crashed,
)]));
// 上一场刚结束 ⇒ selected_session = CRASH(过期选中项),随后用户导入一份崩溃文件
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LaunchFinished(LaunchFinished {
id: "dev".to_string(),
session: CRASH.to_string(),
outcome: LogOutcome::Crashed,
summary: "崩溃(exit 1)".to_string(),
}));
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::DiagnosisReady(report(
"file:crash-2026-11-02_19.40.15-client.txt",
"integrity.unsatisfied_link",
)));
let logs = logs_model(&state).with_status(Lang::En);
assert_eq!(
logs.findings.len(),
1,
"导入的崩溃日志必须画出它的结论:{:?}",
logs.findings
);
assert_eq!(logs.findings[0].rule, "integrity.unsatisfied_link");
}
#[test]
fn a_live_run_says_it_is_running_instead_of_nothing_runs() {
// 视觉复审 r3 的 P2-3:session 索引只在**结束**时追加(`host::logs::sessions`),
// 所以运行中的那一场永远不在 `log_sessions` 里 ⇒ 拿不到实例名与结局 ⇒ r3 的页头在
// 每次实时运行都说「当前没有运行中的实例」。demo 伪造了身份,截图上根本照不出来。
// 抓得住:页头退回 Idle 文案(这次走真实 reducer:只有 `LogAppended(running=true)`)。
// 抓不住:文案长度在某尺寸下会不会撞右侧动作区(那要看截图)。
let mut state = AppState::new();
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogSessionsChanged(vec![session(
CRASH,
"10-29 18:40",
LogOutcome::Crashed,
)]));
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogAppended(LiveLogBatch {
session: OK_RUN.to_string(),
lines: vec![line("[19:22] launching", LogLevel::Info)],
running: true,
}));
let logs = logs_model(&state).with_status(Lang::En);
assert!(logs.live, "live_session 非空就该标记为运行中");
let status = logs.status.clone().expect("运行中必须有副标题");
let idle = unlucky_i18n::catalog::Catalog::of(Lang::En)
.text(unlucky_i18n::catalog::Key::LogsSubtitleIdle);
assert_ne!(status, idle, "运行中的页头不能说「没有运行」");
assert!(status.contains("Running now"), "{status}");
}
#[test]
fn the_hosts_no_rule_matched_placeholder_is_not_a_finding() {
// host 的 `open_session` 在规则引擎无结论时发一份 `rule: ""` 的假报告(非 Option 逼的)。
// 抓得住:把「没命中」画成一条严重度结论(用户会去修一个不存在的毛病)。
// 抓不住:host 该不该改发 `None`(那是 presenter 的 finding)。
let mut state = AppState::new();
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogSessionsChanged(vec![session(
CRASH,
"10-29 18:40",
LogOutcome::Crashed,
)]));
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::LogLinesChanged(vec![line(
"[18:40] nothing to see",
LogLevel::Info,
)]));
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::DiagnosisReady(report(CRASH, "")));
assert!(
logs_model(&state).findings.is_empty(),
"空 rule 是『没命中』的占位,不是结论"
);
state.apply_core(CoreEvent::DiagnosisReady(report(CRASH, "gpu.driver_old")));
assert_eq!(
logs_model(&state).findings.len(),
1,
"换成真规则就得画出来(证明上面的过滤不是把诊断一起关了)"
);
}