feat(model): 按 provider 形状独立适配推理开关 + per-persona 提供商链真接线(裁决 03.4.2/08.4.1/03.4.1 余项)
CI / Backend (build / vet / test / cross-compile) (push) Has been cancelled
CI / Frontend (tsc + vite build) (push) Has been cancelled

- 新增 reasoning_shape.go:**每个 provider 形状一个 resolver,只发自己形状的字段**
  · deepseek:thinking{type} + reasoning_effort(依据 DevDocs/reference/deepseek 官方本地副本)
  · vllm:chat_template_kwargs.enable_thinking · dashscope:顶层 enable_thinking(**只允许显式声明**)
  · openai:仅 reasoning_effort · anthropic:自己的 thinking{budget_tokens}(未改)
  · 未知 kind → WARN 且一个字段都不发(不许静默失效)
- 形状载体:models.json 组级 `reasoning.kind`(可热更新,未声明则不写该键)+ env `LLM_REASONING_KIND`
- 红线:`effort:none` 在只有布尔开关的形状上翻成**显式关思考**,绝不降成任何强度档
- 03.4.1 余项:`Request.PersonaID` + `RuntimeLLM.ForPersona(pid)` 视图;
  每 persona 协议一条链并消费 `RouteProviderForPersona`;`agent/request.go` 非流式路径同一钩子
- **生产装配(主会话补)**:默认 agent 与 personaAgentPool 都改用 `ForPersona(pid)` 视图——
  否则角色级模型/提供商路由在生产里永不被选中(形同虚设)
- 复核:build/vet 绿 + model/agent/config/cmd 包测试绿;5 条变异反证先红后还原
  (其中一条「红但没钉住」已改用例:通道读取加 2s 超时,避免整包 panic 掩盖信号)
- 未落:DashScope 的 auto 推断(缺官方依据,只允许显式声明);Qwen `/think` 前导消息
  (design/01 §2.1 与 design/11 §3 口径冲突,停手报告)
This commit is contained in:
AskaEth committed 2026-10-04 12:57:55 +08:00
1 parent 71fefe5fc3
commit 8890c30bb5
17 files changed
+1496 -134

No files matched your search

+9 -1
View File
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import (
"time"
"git.yeij.top/AskaEth/Cyrene_v2/internal/config"
"git.yeij.top/AskaEth/Cyrene_v2/internal/config/runtimeconfig"
)
// Anthropic Messages (/v1/messages) wire protocol constants.
@@ -163,6 +164,13 @@ func NewAnthropicChat(cfg config.LLMConfig, opts ...AnthropicOption) *AnthropicC
},
log: discardLogger("runtime/model/anthropic"),
}
if kind := strings.TrimSpace(cfg.ReasoningKind); kind != "" && kind != runtimeconfig.ReasoningKindAuto {
// The anthropic protocol defines its own thinking shape, so an
// openai-shape declaration is inert here. Report it rather than letting a
// configured option be silently ineffective (裁决 03.4.2: 禁止静默无效).
a.log.Warn("reasoning.kind ignored: the anthropic protocol defines its own thinking shape",
"provider", ProviderAnthropic, "field", "reasoning.kind", "kind", kind)
}
for _, o := range opts {
o(a)
}
@@ -311,7 +319,7 @@ func (a *AnthropicChatAdapter) buildRequest(req Request, stream bool) ([]byte, e
// provider actually applies. Strength goes through output_config.effort
// instead (design/04 §3.2 fact 6).
thinking, output = anthropicDeepSeekReasoning(a.log, req.Model, req.Thinking, req.ReasoningEffort)
reportForcedToolChoiceWithThinking(a.log, req.Model, req.ToolChoice, anthropicThinkingOn(thinking))
reportForcedToolChoiceWithThinking(a.log, string(vendorDeepSeek), req.Model, req.ToolChoice, anthropicThinkingOn(thinking))
} else {
// Extended thinking shares max_tokens with the visible answer, so on the
// Anthropic endpoint the budget is resolved together with the limit it